Skip to main content
    Search Visibility

    Can Financial Advisors Ask Clients for Online Reviews Under SEC Rules?

    Financial advisors spent years avoiding testimonials entirely because the old rule banned them outright. The rule changed, but allowed and anything goes are not the same thing.

    Krystal Gonzalez, Master of Science in Marketing, University of Colorado, with a specialization in high-tech entrepreneurial marketing.October 17, 20263 min read
    A closed laptop and folded paper map on a kitchen counter in morning light

    For years, a financial advisory firm that asked a client to leave a review online was taking on real regulatory risk. The SEC's advertising rule barred registered investment advisers from using testimonials at all. That changed when the agency modernized its marketing rule, but a lot of advisors are still operating as if testimonials remain off limits, or assuming the opposite, that anything goes now.

    What actually changed, and when

    The SEC's modernized marketing rule, which went into effect in March 2021 with a compliance date of November 2022, lifted the blanket ban on testimonials and endorsements for registered investment advisers. Advisors can now solicit and publish client reviews, under a specific set of conditions the rule lays out.

    The condition that trips up most firms: asking everyone, not just the happy ones

    The rule's cherry-picking concern means an advisor cannot quietly select which clients get asked for a review based on how the relationship is going. The safer approach is a consistent request, sent to the full client list the same way, often through a single email so there is a record that every client was asked rather than a hand-picked few.

    Why Google and Yelp reviews sit in a gray area

    A review on a general platform like Google does not carry the specific disclosures the SEC requires for a testimonial, since the platform was not built for that purpose. Directing clients specifically to leave reviews there, or responding to them in ways that read as promotional, can blur the line between an organic review and a solicited testimonial the rule is meant to govern. Firms should treat any review platform they actively solicit through as subject to the same disclosure expectations as a testimonial on their own website.

    What a compliant request actually looks like

    • Ask the entire client list the same way, not a selected group of favorites
    • Avoid asking for a positive review or wording that suggests what the reviewer should say
    • Disclose any compensation offered in exchange for a review, if any is offered at all
    • Keep a written policy for how and when review requests go out, before soliciting the first one

    The structural fix

    Build a single, documented process for requesting reviews that goes out to every client the same way, states any compensation plainly, and never singles out happy clients. That process satisfies the rule's intent and produces a review record a firm can actually defend if it is ever asked to.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Are financial advisors allowed to ask clients for online reviews?

    Yes, since the SEC modernized its marketing rule, with a compliance date of November 2022. Advisers can solicit testimonials and reviews, but only under specific conditions, including asking clients consistently rather than selectively.

    Can a financial advisor pay a client for a positive review?

    Compensation for a review is allowed under the rule, but it must be disclosed. Offering something only in exchange for a favorable review, rather than for an honest one, raises the same cherry-picking concern the rule is meant to prevent.

    Do Google reviews count as testimonials under the SEC marketing rule?

    The SEC has not definitively classified organic Google reviews as testimonials, but a firm that actively solicits reviews on a public platform should still treat that solicitation with the same care as a testimonial request, since the agency's exam staff has flagged this area directly.

    What is the biggest compliance mistake advisors make when asking for reviews?

    Asking only the clients they expect to respond well, rather than the full client list. That selective approach, often called cherry-picking, undermines the fairness the rule is built around and is one of the issues SEC examiners specifically look for.

    Sources

    About the author

    Krystal Gonzalez

    Master of Science in Marketing, University of Colorado, with a specialization in high-tech entrepreneurial marketing.

    Krystal Gonzalez leads revenue systems strategy at Cellara Growth Co, where answering, follow-up, reputation, and search systems for service businesses are designed, installed, and measured. Every Journal article is drawn from live client work and reviewed against primary sources before publication.